And we certainly haven’t gone against any of our agreements from the past.
I still stand on my opinion that if they’re not actively moving First Nations relations forward with a new legal structure, abolishing an existing one is an incredibly bad idea.
It’s also illegal. Treaty Rights predate and, thus, supercede the Constitution. (As ruled by the Supreme Court.)
The Indian Act and treaty rights are seperate things.
And we certainly haven’t gone against any of our agreements from the past.
I still stand on my opinion that if they’re not actively moving First Nations relations forward with a new legal structure, abolishing an existing one is an incredibly bad idea.