If, like you say, it’s a series of individuals who are making these choices, they must have so much influence that they are effectively casting a shadow on the entire organization. I think that is a flaw of the organization itself. Again, different perspectives.
I would generally agree with that assessment. When I say infected, what I mean the individuals in an org are zionists… but the organization as a whole remains focused on it’s correct mandate.
From my perspective I also have worked in a coprorate environment for a decade. I’ve outlived mergers, multiple boards/ceos, executive teams, and mass layoffs. When something goes wrong business wise, individual humans are held responsible and replaced when necessary.
So I would much rather see the discussion shift towards identifying and amputating the zionist individuals in the CBC.
Also the CAF 100% deserves some heat for not backing the CBC up in this particular instance. I was under the impression ITV pulled a fast one.
Zionism has a definition. I mean it literally.
If, like you say, it’s a series of individuals who are making these choices, they must have so much influence that they are effectively casting a shadow on the entire organization. I think that is a flaw of the organization itself. Again, different perspectives.
I would generally agree with that assessment. When I say infected, what I mean the individuals in an org are zionists… but the organization as a whole remains focused on it’s correct mandate.
From my perspective I also have worked in a coprorate environment for a decade. I’ve outlived mergers, multiple boards/ceos, executive teams, and mass layoffs. When something goes wrong business wise, individual humans are held responsible and replaced when necessary.
So I would much rather see the discussion shift towards identifying and amputating the zionist individuals in the CBC.
Also the CAF 100% deserves some heat for not backing the CBC up in this particular instance. I was under the impression ITV pulled a fast one.