• Amuletta@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I wasn’t living here then, but when the Shaw Center was to be built in Saskatoon, apparently a public town hall type meeting was held to announce it and at the very end the city planners of the time said something like “Oh by the way, we’re mothballing the Harry Bailey Aquatic Center, so this replaces it”.

    To their utter astonishment, people loudly protested and they were forced to back down and keep Harry Bailey. Gee, imagine that - people actually wanted a centrally located pool designed for actual swimming, so that they didn’t have to drive out to the far west edge of town if they lived on the east side. The only other indoor pools in or close to the east side are tiny cramped “leisure” pools. (Lawson is bearable, Lakewood is thoroughly awful for laps.)

    So, Harry Bailey was in service until early 2023 and is now undergoing a massive renovation. Looking forward to swimming there again next year. Last time I drove by they were installing photovoltaic panels on the steep roof.

    • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s always interesting how they call themselves planners yet never consider how people actually get to these places they plan, at least no further than, “oh, they’ll just drive”.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    Municipalities … strapped for cash, and neglecting upkeep on aging pools, now face hefty renovation or rebuild costs — or closure.

    If you are pissed off about this, let your municipality (and the region that your municipality is in) know that they need to STOP widening roads, and degrow car-centric infrastructure. And that all public parking should be paid parking.

    You should also tell them that housing the homeless actually saves money.

    It’s kind of infuriating that municipalities keep investing in money pits that will never bring a positive return to taxpayers or society, yet never have enough money for things like pools.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      We need car centric infra so everyone can live in a mcmansion with a pool in the backyard!

      We dont need these socialist public pools that are actually big enough for exercise and fitness! Every home should have its own 20ft long pool in the backyard and 3 SUVs on the driveway, as god intended

      • Amuletta@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Gahhh! I know you’re joking, but I have seen the sort of regular maintenance the workers do at public pools and never want one of my own.

  • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is the result of kicking the can down the road continually rather than spending tax money on maintaining and building the infrastructure needed by the populace. Everything ends up in a failure state but at least you paid $50 less in tax each year!

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    I wonder how much of the facilities boom came from the economic growth of the 50s, and 60s. Every city I’ve lived in has a few facilities named “Centennial” that were built in 1967. They’re still in use.

    Meanwhile, the 25 year old cut-off used in the article kinda corresponds to the austerity of the 1990s. The facilities I’ve seen built since then (in Ottawa, at least) seem to be municipally required largesse from developers.

    • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Regardless, it’s the fault of the politicians for not earmarking enough money for repairs and maintenance. It’s not like this should be unexpected costs, and if they’re still used, where’s the maintenance slush fund?

      It would be like letting lrt tracks to degrade. Just shameful.

    • bubblewrap@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s another consequence of the out of control construction inflation over the last half century. Compare the various construction price index to the consumer price index - we simply cannot build things affordably anymore.

  • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s so funny, we are finding a not cheap pool in our city right now and the conservative portion of our city is up in arms. These people just want to take away, never improve.

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe the money we pay the government in the form of taxes could go to things like I frastructure improvement and repair instead of insane salaries for public servants? Just a thought? Isn’t a government supposed to plan for these things? I do at my job managing a facility with lots of infrastructure…

      • AlexLost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        How much does an MP or provincial politician make? Now what is the median income of a Canadian? They keep giving themselves raises and slashing services and delaying repairs and maintenance.

        • healthetank@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          MPs make~ 200,000/yr in 2024. In comparison, they made 18,000/yr in 1963, which is roughly 180,000/yr. Seems close enough I’m not gonna argue they’re ridiculously overpaid, unless you’re arguing they’ve always been overpaid.

          MPP in Ontario is at $157,350. Used to be $37,800 in 1980, or $140,000 today. Again, that’s pretty close considering MPPs have had their pay well frozen well below that since early 2010s until this year.

          Median income of Canadian families has stayed pretty flat - only source I can find is a publication from govt of Canada in 2005, but they have 1980 household income at $59,709 (in 2005 dollars), $66,343 in 2005, and $ 95,200 in 2021, ($68,614 in 2005 dollars).

          So again, pretty steady.

          We’ve got lots of issues, but the idea that this is caused by overpaying municipal staff is ridiculous. The actual problem is that these kinds of things aren’t budgeted out properly when constructed. They have the money to build them, not realizing it costs a lot to keep them going, especially when these large repairs are required. I work as an engineering consultant, primarily for municipalities, but an easy example are stormwater ponds. Those ponds in most subdivisions? They’re there to trap sediment and pollutants to keep it out of streams and lakes.

          Tons were constructed from the 80s through to today, paid originally by the developers, but the Town has to maintain them, otherwise all those pollutants wind up in the streams and rivers.

          Provincial govt did an audit a few years ago and found that less than 10% of them had been cleaned since they were installed. They’re about $1mil per cleanout, and no one had budgeted for it when setting property taxes.

          Multiply this by all the other municipal infrastructure we rely on, and its easy to see why things are fucked.