Some people are idiots and climate change is real, therefore you should lose access to nature is basically her argument.
That’s a very constructed take.
Idiots caused wildfires. They said “don’t be idiots in the woods, idiots” and the idiots went back in to be idiots. Now no one gets to use the woods because they don’t know who the idiots are and it’s not safe.
I wish I could say the West is different; we just have more woods.
That’s a very constructed take.
Idiots caused wildfires. They said “don’t be idiots in the woods, idiots” and the idiots went back in to be idiots. Now no one gets to use the woods because they don’t know who the idiots are and it’s not safe.
I wish I could say the West is different; we just have more woods.
The people she accused of being toddlers performed a non-violent protest against the loss of access to public lands.
Believe it or not you can regulate what people can do in a space without banning use of that space and it gets done all the time.
How do you propose we successfully enforce a no smoking ban in woods across an entire province?