This is another example what I posted last week. It’s a nameless source from a official government department making a very serious but ambigous complaint with little context.
Aside from pandering to the crowd that’s looking for reasons to feel more angry I’m not sure what the article is trying to convey with that part.
I read the responses and they were pretty generic to begin with. It was also about 14hrs after the AMA started and he answered only a handful of them.
I imagine with a competence and morality perspective this should knock him out of contention.
Not sure if it’s mentioned in the since the article is paid wall but I think skeezy tech bro is a real understatement for the people that run the company.
They’re not a the extreme overt level of far right, white nationism like Elon but they’re part of funding and lobbying for much of that stuff.
He’s a piece of shit.
But also to signal that he’s on a specific side. People would call these dog whistles but I think it’s bit to overt for that.
I can’t believe we pay for people to post this stuff.
Postmedia Tells Shareholders $35 Million in Federal Government Handouts is Now a ‘Key Pillar’ of Its Business Strategy
I would file this under socialized things Liberals slowly ruined and Conservatives threaten to destroy the second they get in power.
I’m 6’2" and things were already tight for me as well.
The problem with thier shuffling method is it compounds the already bad flight delays(there’s also the carry-on shuffle they caused) and most of their seats won’t even fit me so at a certain point you might just get bumped off the entire flight and they don’t even give you a real number to make decisions with. I actually don’t even know which seat fits me because aside from padding the seat angle also changes the real leg room so the pitch measurement is almost useless.
I think that is the crux of it aside from readers having little expectations of being informed for these reportings, it also seems that the news outlets no longer have viable revenue models that allow them to staff to the level it would take to write proper articles which is why the Toronto Star was the best out of them.
Will point out that CBC does take a lot of revenue from us collectively and this low effort type of reporting is become very common for them. That’s addition to clearly trying to pander certain crowds with titles like this
Greenland has become the island that could break NATO
I’ll still defend them as being the best large scale news outlet in Canada but they’re becoming a astonishing poor place to be informed about events.
Since one of the top post here this week is from Fox News I wanted to take the opportunity to let people know how bad news is even from real news organizations and they should probably avoid interacting with places like Fox altogether.
This is a pretty widely reported about Westjet cutting the legroom. Almost all these articles has little useful information and largely just convey a sentiment that people should be angry at Westjet.
To provide examples of useful information this information took me about 25 minutes to gather:
Has most of the airline - https://www.airlinequality.com/info/seat-pitch-guide/
Has less airlines but different plane model - https://www.netflights.com/useful-tips/legroom-chart
The Toronto Star article shows that more than half the seats is the smallest size.
Pitch is a industry term that doesn’t clearly represent actual leg room.
Westjet does not present this information clearly when booking to allow the customer to make a informed decision.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/calgary/article/cramped-conditions-questioned-on-recent-westjet-flight/
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/westjet-seat-overhaul-pause-9.7014320
https://globalnews.ca/news/11601466/westjet-shorter-legroom-flights-costs/
This Toronto Star one actually has some useful information:
Even without Venezuela Trump has been very clear about wanting to drop oil prices. Whether it be lobbying OPEC, global trade instability or whatever “drill baby drill” is suppose to be.
For the latter part of your comment. I’ll point to Trump’s approval ratings, while as whole it’s dropped noticeably his MAGA base is still pretty positive on him after pretty shit year for Americans. Alberta has a base where they’ll point to Trudeau even though he’ll be years removed and they saw peak outputs/revenue during his time.
I think you’re confused about what municipal, provincial and federal governments should be advocating for their constituents. I’m from BC which is 4th by GDP and I believe we crack the top 3 in Income tax paid. For that the only recollection of federal involvement lately was them criticizing our infrastructure spending(buying ferries from China) and how we’ll get to take on most of the risk from a pipeline with little of the reward and even less input.
This isn’t a criticism of Charlie or even what he’s doing, it’s completely fair he wants to do things on his own accord. It’s about the general ideology that exists on what needs to be done to truly make changes.
To put it another way many Liberal supporters(I’m not one) want Pierre to stay on like some hardcore Conservatives do. Pierre staying is bad for Canada but good for the Liberals, in the same light Conservatives would love for all progressives to operate outside of the actual political system. It just pushes Canada towards the American system where real progressive politics exist almost entirely outside of the system with influence.
I’ve seen some takes where Charlie is allowed to be his authentic self now that he doesn’t have to worry about keeping his seat.
The honest question is he doing more for Canadians right now then he did with his seat? For anyone wondering he held his riding from 2004 to 2025 and now it’s Conservative seat for the first time in history. Not saying he was guaranteed his seat by any means, but there’s this odd progressive idolization of people working outside “the system” that has be extremely unproductive historically.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapuskasing—Timmins—Mushkegowuk
It pretty hard to take this place seriously when this is the first thing you see from the same author.
Along with stories like Taxes are bad, First Nation is taking your land, Goverment is after your free speech, Goverment allowing food dyes, Goverment is blocking natural resource profits.
Referendums and the specific topic is a bit different. But I think looking at Trump and America should make people very wary of what having 30% of the population as fanatics can do.
Another thing that a lot of Conservatives will fight you tooth and nail over, but if you say they want to move back to a society where things a dictated by Christian values they’ll nod in agreement. This also discounts a bunch of the most popular Conservatives personalities literally saying it.
For people wondering about the general creditability of the source.
Wall Street Journal quietly walks back false claim Charlie Kirk shooter had pro-trans messages on his bullets
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/wall-street-journal-quietly-walks-182931692.html
For anyone wondering it shows ~9m people eligible in 2025 in the original doc titled: A Proposed Framework for the Canadian Dental Care Plan from the Dentist Association
Also I think it should be mentioned that the wording used in the StatCan data is “Approved applicants”.
I watched a video about how many progressive movements was at one point lofty dreams before they became reality which somewhat swayed my belief in how things can be campaigned politically.
In itself I do there’s space for this, but it seems like it’s shoving things that’ll more conducive on getting movement on the issue like voting reform to the side. Or in your analogy a lot of the people in Canada want the patient dead and the current system caters to them, so having these theoretical discussions about how we could keep them alive doesn’t change that. We either need to change those people beliefs or change the way politics work.
I don’t mean to single this post out because I’m bringing it up since it happens a lot.
But why do we keep having these housing talks that have no basis of reality. Specifically isn’t it almost universally believed that if the government thought something they passed would noticeably lower housing prices it be repealed by the end of the week.
It’s like going into a personal finance space and 90% is what would you do if you won the lottery.
This is what CBC should be doing. They should really invest more in small local communities that is very underserved these days.
Even for international level news people would benefit from a vantage of how it impacts them on a local level.