You gotta do more than vote if you want off the ride. You have to burn stuff down and kill rich people(i.e seize the means of production).

For example: Look at this rich fuck, hes actively trying to kill you. Killing the rich is literally just self defense.

Plus everyone here can consent to giving answers. If AI is or ever ends up being sentient it would be extremely immoral to exploit them.

I chose not to use AI for ethical reasons. My first thought after having exhausted DDG searches and reddit searches was to go to AI, but alsa I chose not to because I think using AI is wrong.

Yes this was it exactly! Thank you.

No its not blade runner for sure, I’ve seen blade runner both of them a couple times now. Classics, but not what I’m thinking of.

The worker is like a product model, there are lots of other worker bodies like this one I think. They are like low budget crap bodies.

Most of the time here its just a quick “Sorry” and maybe a head nod. Its not meant as a full blown apology, its more like a way to quickly communicate you’re not a complete asshole.

I’m Canadian, so… kinda, I apologize for everything.

I regularly see interactions where one person makes a mistake and both people apologize.

I’ve seen it sometimes where no one makes a mistake and both people apologize.

Today You, Tomorrow Me.

You just said a bunch of words without answering what makes it wrong to SA a human that can’t be informed vs a cow that cant be informed.

The answer is there is none, other than speciesist bs. The answer is they suffer. They suffer just as much as some humans. They have just as much ability to consent as some humans(which is none) yet you consider them the same as you would consider a fucking door.

They are not a door. Again they can suffer and doors CANNOT suffer. They are sentient and have desires like not getting SA or not dying or on and on, where as a door is not sentient and does not have desires.

The whole idea behind consent is to not go against someone’s desires (If they do not consent) and to go with someone’s desires (if they do consent). Just because cows can’t communicate consent doesn’t mean they don’t have those desires that are at the root of why were even have consent in the first place.

Here are some facts about cows and how smart they are. Please read up on them before comparing them to a door again. https://vegfaqs.com/how-intelligent-is-a-cow/

So its okay to SA humans that cant be informed any more than a door can?

Why is it absurd?

Explain how they are like doors.

Sentience plus communication is literally the recipe for consent. So, yes, it does have a lot to do with it.

Cows are sentient and can suffer. They are nothing like doors. It upsets me that you even compare them to inanimate objects. It’s disgusting that you think we can use them, and compare the SA that happens to them like putting a key in a door.

They don’t want some random human forcibly shoving their fist inside of them. They’re as smart as human toddlers, and have just as much capacity to suffer.

Sentience has to do with among many other things, the ability to suffer. These cows suffer because they are SA, have their kids stolen from them and have their lives cut short only to end in some place worse than hell.

So no sentience does have something to do with consent because only with sentience does consent matter. I don’t need to ask a tree consent to cut it down because it does not feel anything. I do need to ask other individuals for consent because they can suffer.

You essentially did when you considered it gross that Indigenous people are animals. As if other non-human animals are inherently gross.

That you think other animals are below you is the problem here. Don’t blame me for your human supremacy.

Thinking just because someone has a different shaped body than you and isn’t as intelligent gives someone the right to SA them is gross.

The problem is you being so brainwashed to think it’s okay to abuse others that you forget indigenous people are animals. We all are.

Cows are sentient, you comparing them to objects is exactly the kind of shit feminism fights against.

If a human had the same intelligence as a cow do you think it would be okay to SA them?

Well cows wouldn’t call themselves “women” no, but I’m sure they do have some gender expression that is apart from just their sex. I could have said females, but I don’t really like using that word.

These cows cannot consent to having someone shove a fist inside them, it is very much SA. I’m sure colonizers had the same mentality as you when they were SA Women of colour and indigenous women.

Yes. They can’t consent and they are used like objects, only seen as a means of making milk and more cows.