1·
2 hours agoAnd if Russia doesn’t stop? What would you suggest they do?
- 0 Posts
- 28 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
Cake day: October 28th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
That would solve nothing because they would be condemned for using it.
No one needs nukes
There’s a real difference between doing something on an open internet forum and doing it out in public, physically. Online, people have to choose to click on something, follow a link, or open a post. If they don’t want to see it, they can just scroll past or block it. In the real world, you can’t avoid someone the same way—you can’t block a person walking toward you on the sidewalk, and you can’t just scroll away from something happening right in front of you.
Plus, online spaces usually come with filters, warnings, and moderation tools that don’t exist in physical public spaces. Everything online is also separated by screens and distance, so the impact isn’t the same as doing something right in front of people who have no way to opt out.
Good thing this isn’t public.
I believe that public display of religion makes enough people feel uncomfortable that it was banned in Quebec.
Let me ask you this, why do you feel that you should be able to practice your religion in plain view of everyone else when you make them uncomfortable? And a follow up question, don’t you think that you should be going to the designated spot for this?
I certainly don’t think we should ban religion in general. That’s crazy talk. I just don’t think we should be forcing things onto other people. Do you?
Do you believe that people should be able to have sex out in public for everyone to see? And, why Do you feel the way you do?
Religion is like sex. You can do it in your home and maybe even designated enclosed places in groups, but you should never do it out in public—and under no circumstances should you ever involve children.
It’s not racism with more steps. You don’t even know it has not been enforced improperly. It’s a lot easier to enforce enforcement than it is to stop people ruining the world
I love it. Public prayer shouldn’t happen at all.
264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-264.1.html
It’s quite open ended and easy to prove. I would not at all consider this to be steep.
Now, getting that all the way through a court and to a punishment that sticks is an entirely different thing! But the data for this topic of transit violence does not at all require prosecution. So if I tell you I’m gonna fucking kick your ass, that is uttering a threat, and it would qualify.
I didn’t assume. I don’t disagree those are important topics. But, do you know for a fact the people that face those problems are the people who are the 50/100000, or 0.05% that commit “assault” on transit systems?
The article defines that as…
common assault, assault with a weapon and aggravated — and lumps together all other violent crimes, including homicide, sexual offences, criminal harassment, robbery and uttering threats.
uttering threats
The arrest rate for all violent offences reported fell from 20 per cent to 11 per cent in the same time period, according to the TTC’s numbers. The charge rate dropped from about 19 per cent to 10 per cent.
Maybe the solution is charge criminals with crimes, eh?
Transit-related crimes include incidents on public buses, street cars, trolleys, subways, urban railroads and school buses, and subway stations, bus stops and shelters.
300% rise in kids on school busses being assholes and uttering threats!
Based on the data they provided, I stand by my opinion that the headline is baity, creates panic and drives misinformation.
What action do you think needs to be taken?
My point is to say that it was raised by 300% sounds incredible. Perhaps The headline should read “increased violence on public transit concerning”
Am I reading these numbers right that it’s Under 50 individual occurrences per year in a city?
Because if that’s true this article is very sensational. Because in the states it would be 50 times per day. So to say it is increased a significant percent sounds a bit like fear mongering
͏︂︅︋︈︋︆︄︄︃︊͏︇︀︈︉︄︌︉А︁︁︋͏️︆︀︎︃͏︃︊︅︉︂︈︂͏︃︎️︌͏︄︅︆︃͏︅I︉︊︉︌︉︆️︀︉︇︍︅️︈︎︂ ︅︊︁︁︋︈︇︋︁︉︅︂︍︃︍︁︌︁︋︁︂︃︆︌︅︊︂︈b︃︈︎︅︇︇͏︊︉︈︊︈︀︁︋︁︋︍︊︂︎︄︋︍︀͏︍︅️︄︎︂️u︉͏︄︄︅︌︌︀︃︆︎︎︋︃︆︃︎️︃︊︋︋l︄︆︍︁️︂︎︂︅︁️︂︆️︁︌︊͏︇︌︋︇︃︂︁l︈︉︀︈︎︉︂︋︅︃︋︌︌︋︇︅︇︄️︄️︇︌︅͏︌︌︅︃︋️︉︅︈︃s︉︋︉︈︅︊︀͏︅︋︆︀︁͏︌h︅︂︉͏︌︍️︌︌͏︇︎︉︀︆︆︃︂i︎︆︎︊︊︆︄︉︌︌︎︃͏︀︅︋͏️︍͏︇︉︉︉︀︇︊︉︂︁️︌︅︆︀︅︇t︅︇︄︎︋︍︇︊️︅︍︎︊︎︁︌︋︁︉️︌︁︆︇?︄︉︂︇︈︈︃͏︃︌︍︀︍️︆︄︇︄︊️͏︅︅︊︌︄︍️
I want it all to end lol. There are many reasons. And many parts of a solutions. They all need to happen. No non-citizen ownership of land. No corporate ownership of single family homes. No more than two homes per person, and maybe only one can be rented.
Whatever rules keep costs down and investors out. I’m down for everything.
Perfect. Grab it up.
Proven? Show me the data.
And if Russia said “fuck it” and called their bluff, what should Ukraine do?