• mesa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    At what point do we start making the factories ourselves? No really if ddr3 is significantly going up would it make sence for all these smaller companies to pool thier resources and start fabbing thier own chips?

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      unfortunately chip foundries take years to set up (just filtering the air alone takes months), so it’s not really a solution - although china is attempting to do exactly this.

      • brave_lemmywinks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        89
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        "It’s hard work and it takes too long. China is trying to do it "

        2 years later and after China has done it, “why are the chinese taking the lead on all of this? we should be doing things more like China.”

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          60
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Sorry, I was perhaps unclear - China is and has been setting up chip foundaries regardless of the global memory prices, simply to have domestic production of those components. Production of memory modules during this period of AI ratfucking is just a happy bonus.

          • brave_lemmywinks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Yes because they have an autonomy incentive, but “our” (as in Western capitalism) incentives is solely on profit and profit is being done, therefore we will never solve this because in fact there’s no problem. We are being mocked by all these PC parts suppliers.

            • AliOski@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              The fact it runs on profit is not the deciding factor in this case. If the RAM manufacturers had more capacity, they would profit even more. The main problem is that those factories are huge investments that you would need to commit until the finish-line successfully without going bankrupt before you will be able to produce anything. China can take this risk because state funds and actual geopolitical justifications. Western countries can say to themselves too easily that they can keep buying it from Asia, which causes no countries or investors to want to commit to a similar project.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I don’t think you’re wrong, I’m just not sure how it relates to what I said.

              • ripcord@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                But they really wanted to shit on capitalism regardless of context.

                What’s weird is that capitalism should be driving others to set up fabs because it is so profitable.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  I mean fair enough I suppose. It’s almost like capitalism doesn’t quite work like how it says it does in the advertising… sigh.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              16 hours ago

              More or less, though they recently bought their way in to a domestic EUV foundry so their coveting of TSMC will likely reduce in the near future as that comes online.

              • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                55 minutes ago

                How did they get an EUV foundry? I thought ASML is the only company in the world that can make the machines and they aren’t allowed by the US to sell EUV machines to China.

      • Gork@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Why filter the air at all? Why not just turn the clean room into a vacuum? No air contaminants since there’s no air. All the stuff in there looks to be automated anyway.

        I have no idea how silicon fabs work so this probably isn’t realistic.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Many reasons! The enormous building imploding is probably the big one, but risks from cold welding, use of atmospheric cooling, relying on exposure to atmosphere for many steps in the process, etc. are all additional factors. It’s a good question though.

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I can just see makers starting to do small scale projects such as https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ddr5/russian-enthusiasts-are-building-their-own-ddr5-ram-amidst-the-worldwide-shortage-as-easy-as-sourcing-your-own-memory-modules-and-soldering-them-on-empty-pcbs

        And then naturally expanding. I mean we talk about all these hypotheticals but at a certain price range, impractical turns practical. If you cannot convince any big chip makers to make your thing and people will pay 2x for your thing, then getting together with smaller manufacturing starts to make sense.

        I dunno im just a small maker person. Made my own laptop from parts and all that. I see this as a potential opportunity.

        • Benaaasaaas@group.lt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          You still need the chipmaker to make you the memory module, assembly is not the problem

          • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Sure. A hobbyist with the right equipment can make technically functional memory as a scientific curiosity. But making any memory module that is as powerful as anything that’s come out in the last twenty years is going to require millions of dollars in investment and years of effort combining the work of thousands.

          • mesa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Oh nice ill take a look! We have a 10k pick and place machine over at a local makerspace and ive thought about prefab chips before. Just for fun, but its still a bit of money.

      • Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That is so awesome! NGL, some of that equipment looks more sophisticated than what I use in my university’s semiconductor lab. But the spin coater with the pot lid cracks me up a bit.

    • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Nobody (aside from China, for purely geopolitical reasons) really wants to invest billions of dollars in a multiple years long process that could be instantly undermined by the popping of the AI bubble.

      This level of demand is not sustainable, and the big tech companies know it.

      • ultranaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        This isn’t really accurate, there’s been literally hundreds of billions invested over the past several years. The only reason prices are predicted to normalize after 2028 is because that’s when the new fabs come online that those investments are paying for.

        • carmo55@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Who do you think is going to be buying DRAM at the current prices in 2027?

          Before the bubble, there used to be oversupply of DRAM leading to price fixing scandals, that’s what will eventually happen again.

          • minfapper@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Unfortunately, we’re not going to get an over supply of DRAM once the bubble pops.

            Most of the current production is HBM, which is juuust architecturally different enough from DRAM to not be useful for desktop computers

          • ultranaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Probably anyone who wants RAM. 2027 production is mostly already sold, the shortage isn’t going away until there’s more fabs. 2027 is more likely to see higher prices than lower.

    • raspirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Nice profile pic. I’ve been wanting to find a maker/tinkerer community on lemmy but I haven’t come across one yet. Am I just not looking hard enough? I love seeing and discussing people’s DIY electronics / 3D printed projects.

        • raspirate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I used to use sync, but it’s been abandoned and I heard from other former sync users that summit had a comparable feature set, so I switched to that. Summit shows profile pics next to each user.

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Theres some. Honestly more people are on mastodon than lemmy. It hasnt taken off like the mastodon crowd. If you do #maker on mastodon.social for example, its much better.

        I wish the threadiverse supported hashtags and more mastodon stuff but it is what it is.

        Thanks!

          • mesa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            44 minutes ago

            I had to really look. But once i started following it was an avalanche. Lots of indie creators and such.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It takes 4-5 years to build a new memory fab from scratch for companies in the industry.

      They’re talking about no price reductions for 1.5 years.

      (And the reason they’re saying that is because the first significant new production capacity isn’t expected to be up until mid-2027 and isn’t expected to be scaled up to full production until 2028.)

      And they already moved that forward by something like six months, probably by spending more on stuff like construction, so I doubt that there’s more slack to eliminate. Can’t just speed it up a little more.

    • Goodeye8@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It upfront investment cost is simply too much to just start manufacturing your own chips. Just the fab alone would take around 20-30 billion and 4-6 years to build. Then add another couple of billions and 3-4 years to design a DDR5 chip that would give comparable performance to what the big 3 manufacture.

      • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        ASML has an order book running to 2028, the problem is it’s almost impossible to create a competitor to ASML - Demand for fabs is not the issue.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s decades away. Making dumb chips is possible, but we lack the supply chains, infrastructure, and learned knowledge of making advanced tech.

      If you doubt this look at how intel and nvidia are having a hard time in making usable chips on US soil.