• Trex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hopefully we’ll start prioritizing Passenger Cars over freight like the rest of the world

    • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      We will be building a new high speed rail from Quebec to Toronto so passenger rail will finally be separate from freight rail. Finally drag our asses out of the 1800’s.

      • ryper@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The amount of money planned for that could probably cover twinning a much larger amount of existing track, with less environmental impact.

        • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Why just twin the line and still have something designed in the 1800’s. Canadians are so damn cheap to do anything properly.

          • ryper@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Twinning is a more cost-effective way to have passenger rail separated from freight, and it could make rail travel more practical for a larger part of the country than just that one corridor the high speed rail plan covers. A new route over new land is so much worse for the environment.

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Twinning is a more cost-effective way to have passenger rail separated from freight

              Sure, but if you want actual high-speed passenger rail, the track needs to be straight and level.

              The current freight tracks are as level as possible, but to achieve that, they follow the terrain, leading to some very twisty lines that require lower speeds.

              Simply twinning those won’t get near as much of an improvement for passenger rail as is needed.

            • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              It would be dumb to put in new lines and not make them high speed. We are so far behind the rest of the world it’s shocking. Not sure if you travel the world at all, but when you see what is available in other countries, you realize how embarrassing our country is in that regard. It would not be worth it to just put in more low speed rail lines, kinda pointless IMHO.