• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I for one am positively shocked at this development.

    If they do passenger priority, that’ll send me to the ER.

  • Sunshine@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Restore the glory days of Via Rail. We need to save resources when the American embargo hits.

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Isn’t it a lack of rails that’s the problem, not a lack of rail cars? Passenger trains have to give way to cargo trains, and dedicated tracks are the solution.

    • clanker_victim_555@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s just as much who owns the rails. In Vancouver we have a commuter rail service that runs on lines owned by the freight companies. So sometimes people have to watch as they wait in a siding while stuff goes by first.

      • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I think freight priority over passenger is the perfect analogy for where we find ourselves today; the systems are wholly subservient to capital

      • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        18 hours ago

        This is the overall issue with Via rail (and interestingly enough, Amtrak). Canada theoretically mandates that passenger rail traffic has priority for rail segments under contention, and freight must sit on the siding. This is by statute. However, rail companies often/always say “lol fuck off” and go anyways, arguing either the train length exceeds the siding length or essentially “we’re already here”.

        The result is Via rail (and Amtrak) service is literally always late, almost always because of freight traffic. Until they actually start enforcing passenger rail priority (or building dedicated passenger rail lines like adult countries) I don’t see how rail transit can possibly become viable in North America.

      • u/CaperGrrl79@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah same in the Maritimes. Going from Halifax to Montréal, aside from the expense, is brutally slow along one track in New Brunswick because CN haven’t maintained the tracks. Because they don’t move freight anymore, from what I understand.

      • Trex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Hopefully we’ll start prioritizing Passenger Cars over freight like the rest of the world

        • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          19 hours ago

          We will be building a new high speed rail from Quebec to Toronto so passenger rail will finally be separate from freight rail. Finally drag our asses out of the 1800’s.

          • ryper@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            The amount of money planned for that could probably cover twinning a much larger amount of existing track, with less environmental impact.

            • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Why just twin the line and still have something designed in the 1800’s. Canadians are so damn cheap to do anything properly.

              • ryper@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Twinning is a more cost-effective way to have passenger rail separated from freight, and it could make rail travel more practical for a larger part of the country than just that one corridor the high speed rail plan covers. A new route over new land is so much worse for the environment.

                • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  15 hours ago

                  It would be dumb to put in new lines and not make them high speed. We are so far behind the rest of the world it’s shocking. Not sure if you travel the world at all, but when you see what is available in other countries, you realize how embarrassing our country is in that regard. It would not be worth it to just put in more low speed rail lines, kinda pointless IMHO.

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Canada could also benefit from a shinkansen line or two. With population centers mostly along a straight line in the south, it would allow for rapid transit between major cities on dedicated passenger rail.

    • allen@rail.chat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Freight right-of-way ownership is also a problem, but the car set they are replacing/adding to is 75+ years old, they are sturdy and reliable, but having more cars means that they could increase service beyond 3 trips a week on these routes. At the moment, occasional breakdowns and maintenance periods mean they face long distance equipment shortages sometimes.

      @ryper @radish6367

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I assume this is primarily for the GTA commuter rail where that’s less(?) of an issue.

      But in any case, the VIA rolling stock is pretty old, AFAIK.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Everything VIA is run down. But yeah the rail is the biggest issue and probably more expensive.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Half of the country lives in a straight line between windsor and quebec city, so it would be a great start to improve rail there first (even if it feels unfair to the rest of the country)…

      Even just toronto to montreal would be a great place to start in terms of bringing canada in line with other developed nations

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Hopefully this spurs more rail in the rest of the country.

      I was just watching city talk yesterday about Switzerland’s rail network and how interconnect it is.

      What shocked me the most was this overlay of Switzerland over Quebec and how inexistent rail is Canada.

      1000064699

      Worth a watch for anyone interested:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zpSSkkpTrY

      Map of the rail network not including buses or light rail, meanwhile we in Canada are debating if high-speed rail should exist between Quebec and Montreal.

      1000064701