I am revisiting Medievil II for the PS1 and going through it, but I really recall not having liked the sequel. I was okay with the story, which did make comprehensible sense given the time going forward, someone ending up with the pages of Zarok’s spellbook and all. It’s just a rehash of the first game, just time going forward.

Some of the bosses you got to fight were okay, but a lot of them weren’t memorable. It was cool to fight Jack the Ripper in that game and they made him creepy as hell. The levels were annoying and were poorly planned. Winston the Ghost was like Navi to me in that game, but only more bearable because you can skip his ass a lot of the time.

The weapons aren’t that fun to use, only glad they kept the crossbows and a sword, I guess. The cane you get is arguably the worst of them. The characters introduced were forgettable. I mean, I’m finding more setbacks with the sequel than there is to like and I’m struggling.

The original game was more fun with its dark gothic fantasy setting, you went off to some area to get your upgrades and you met characters whose weapons they specialized in which was cool. The talking gargoyle heads had wit to them and I always talked to them wherever they were, loved the voice acting.

The first game was remade twice probably for good reason. Although I probably would have wished that the sequel would’ve been given a remake of its own, just to see what would be taken out and what it’d be replaced with. It probably would’ve been better in that exchange.

  • mohab@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    Guilty Gear Strive.

    Plus R is my favorite fighting game. Xrd I hated because they fucked with my character (Zato/Eddie) but I could tell it’s a fun game…

    Strive just fucking sucks. The irony is I did vibe a little more with Zato in Strive than I did in Xrd, but WTF was everything else in this damn game… they just kinda ripped away anything that made characters unique in favor standardized systemic depth and breadth.

    Less unique moves, less unique combos, even animations feel too samey compared to Plus R or Xrd… I hate it. Everything just feels needlessly homogeneous.

    Even the game’s ideas suck. Like, WTF is Zabubu…

    Every time I give it a shot all I’m thinking of is: why the fuck am I not playing Plus R instead?

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    I don’t play very many series-based games, but off the top of my head, I would have to say Subnautica Below Zero is my most hated series game. And if I had to choose the second one, battlefield 1, or whatever battlefield it was that added a bunch of smaller stories instead of having an overarching story.

  • wowbaggerip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Metal Gear Solid 5.

    How can you just ditch your main character’s voice actor? As a Metal Gear completionist, how do I even play this traditionally linear game now that it’s open world and packed with repetitive side missions? Why am I building a strut base and hiring staff that I magically airlift to a chopper out on the battlefield? Overall a disappointment, not because of bad graphics or bad controls or bad gameplay, just a hodgepodge of content that was too much of a departure from the format of the first 4 linear games. I never finished it and probably never will. I know Konami threw multiple wrenches in Kojima’s gears during development but I feel the overall direction was still flawed from the onset. Open World was just so popular at that time and maybe they forced it on Kojima, who knows. I know he didn’t want to make a 5th game anyway so I’m gonna just pretend it never happened and be happy with the first 4 and the PSP titles.

  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    God of War III. Good gameplay, but what the hell was that story? Kratos kills everyone (including his own father) in an unneccessarily sadistic way, turns the whole world into chaos and ruin and then offs himself with his own sword.

    That felt like reading a school shooter fanfiction.

    Fun fact: He also pushes a helpless nude woman into a door mechanism that kills her. Just…why?

    No wonder they made a prequel after that and then rebooted the series.

    • mohab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      Good gameplay

      Massive understatement though. GoW3 is still the best western action game to this day.

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s a shame. If you liked the first two or just want a really awesome SciFi rpg, you should give it a go. The reaction to the ending was really overblown imho. And it wasn’t retconned per se, it was expanded and more options were added.

      I beat the game before any changes were made to the ending and I didn’t feel nearly at visceral as some people did. The changes they made also helped fill in any real qualms I had. Not to mention, even if it’s as bad as they say, the ending is like 1% of a trilogy spanning SciFi epic. It’s an incredible rpg series, one of the best ever.

  • AstroLightz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Borderlands

    • 1: Decent
    • 2: Best in the series
    • Pre-Sequel: Playable Clap-Trap is the only redeeming factor.
    • 3: Solid gameplay, shit narrative
    • 4 Shit.
    • mursejoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ve bought and played them all. Presequel and BL4 are wasted money in my eyes.

      After 4, I’ll never buy one again. I am a huge BL3 fan and 4 was just a soulless cash grab.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Controversial take: doom 1 is better than doom 2. Doom 2 has a bunch of awful levels.

    I didn’t really like doom2016 or eternal that much, either. Too much start-and-stop.

    • Lucy [she/faer]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Doom 2 is a great base for mods but yeah levels that come with it are ahhh a mixed bag.

      But when we’re talking about a disappointing sequel, it’s hard not to mention Doom 3. Turning a fun and silly game into a slog with jumpscares is quite a decision!

  • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    29 minutes ago

    Deus Ex Human Revolution might be the best game that I hate lol (I guess sort of not an answer to OP, since Invisible War is maybe worse)

    It’s just not close to as good as the original and it still gets so much praise and so many more fans. They dropped so much of the strategy and depth of Deus Ex. It doesn’t hold up nearly as well on repeat playthroughs.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Destiny 2.

    Don’t get me wrong, Destiny 1s story was really bad. It wasn’t originally like that, but thanks to Jason Jones thats how it ended up. Never forgiving him for doing that to Joe Statens work like that.

    But literally almost everything else In D1 is better than D2. Gunplay, armor and weapon designs, raids, environment design, art style, etc. The only things D2 has over D1 are graphical fidelity, more than 30 fps, and the original Red War story writing was more coherent (but its not even in the game anymore because lazy developers be lazy).

  • Somebody_Else@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The last of us 2.

    I liked the first game, the twist at the end was a bit iffy, but it was understandable from a character perspective (Joel was never a good guy, and him deciding to kill a bunch of fireflies to save his psuedo-daughter from an iffy medical procedure makes sense to his character).

    The second game was fantastic mechanically, and a train wreck everywhere else.

    I understood the story they tried to tell, and they might have even told that story decently.

    But it was absolutely not what I signed up for, I went from a coming of age (Ellie) / found family (Both) / redemption (Joel) story, and went right into a gritty “the price of revenge” story that was just so emotionally exhausting. Half the story was spent on a character I didnt care about, the timeline was confusing, and most of all, I didnt want to play a game about Ellie (and Joel’s brother) descending into emotionally driven monsters who sacrifice everything for revenge.

    Its hard to say the game was “bad,” since mechanically it was good, and the story had depth. The confusing timeline wasnt great, but was survivable if the game was otherwise good. It was just such a tonal whiplash, and was such a slog to get through that it killed the whole series for me.

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Out of all the hate I’ve read about TLOU2, I’ve never seen anyone say the timeline is confusing. I also can’t see the tonal whiplash, personally. Both games are incredibly dark.

  • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    30 minutes ago

    Gauntlet (2014) if you count it as a sequel to Legends and Dark Legacy, is a big disappointment. I think simple games can be fine but this is just too simple. Legends just barely had enough depth to be good, and then they go and make something simpler. I had so much fun with local co-op Gauntlet Legends on Dreamcast.

  • W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I liked “Dark Quiet Death” but the sequels were just worse and worse cash grabs. It got worse after the original creator left and they made a child-friendly mascot for the game.