• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I hope somebody is keeping a list of all these people because it’s straight up a list of fascists.

  • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Canadian politicians have never heard of this thing called “optics” before. It’s a very isolated and fart-sniffing group of people

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Misleading title. Yes, Charlie Kirk’s assassination sparked a conversation about the importance of free speech and disavowing political violence. The standing ovation was not for Charlie, but for the outcome of that speech.

    Still, you’d think they’d at least TRY to be reasonable with the optics of the conversation.

    • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They don’t seem interested in optics given their other clown behaviour of inviting PJ2025 galaxy brains to speak behind closrd doors.

      Canada didn’t cancel on them from backlash. The garbage people they invited did.

    • teemrokit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 hours ago

      But isn’t what Kirk did constitute as hate speech here in Canada. We don’t have freedom of speech, we have freedom of expression.

      He didn’t deserve to die but he was toxic in every sense of the word.

  • Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Me when I read the headline: DAFUQ

    Me when I read the article: oh, ok.

    Me when I realized it was yahoo: God damn me for falling for click bait.

    • epicstove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Thr moment I saw thr link I thought “This has GOT to be really shitty bait.”

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Conservative MP for Lethbridge Rachel Thomas pays tribute to Charlie Kirk in the House of Commons, calls for the defence of free speech and against political violence. She gets a standing ovation from the Conservatives and the Liberals.

    Emphasis mine.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s right. If they had not mentioned him or mentioned a few examples, him among them, that would have made the optics very different.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Problem with that though is their intention was specifically him. You’re removing their motive from this by saying they could have not talked about him. Their motive was him. Honoring him. Lionizing him. Making a murder martyr of him. You can’t take away the motive.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Why the fuck is our supposedly liberal government giving standard ovations to conservative pundits? What do they hope to accomplish by pushing this rhetoric? Right wingers will never see this and think “wow maybe I’ll vote liberal next election” you fucking idiots. I hate everything.

    • dom@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That’s cause our liberals have been moving further right. Carney himself is pretty much an old school conservative.

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        15-20 years ago, Carney’s platform would be PC, and Polieverre’s failed platform would have been a joke.

        • dom@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yup. Exactly. And ndp is just in the corner shitting the bed

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Maybe if all the “strategic voters” had even a little bit of a spine. “I prefer the NDP but I need to vote NDP! Hey, why does the NDP not get any support?!”

            How many Canadians flatly refuse to vote for what they believe while being mad that the government isn’t reading their minds? We aggressively signal that we do not want the NDP and then get mad that they aren’t the thing we keep showing them that we do not want. Get a clue.

            • dom@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              If this is such a systemic problem that it alters elections, the problem is with the system.

              The individuals are doing a risk/benefit assessment at a micro level. It is more damaging for them to have a conservative government than it is for them to have a liberal government and that may weigh more to them than the incredibly slim possibility of having an ndp government.

              You cant penalize people for picking what is in their best interest. And they can still be pissed off that the best choice they had still led to a shitty outcome.

              If you want something different, the system needs to change.

              • Soup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                100% that we need reform, something the Liberals will not give us.

                At some point though we have to admit that our system is less one rigged for a specific party at it’s core and more one that benefits the most established party at the time. If we all voted for a different party they would ultimately win. A huge reason why people say they won’t vote NDP is because they claim that the party “doesn’t have a chance”. If they wanted that party to win_before_ voting for them then we deserve everything we get because as a population we’re too fucking stupid for any other outcome.

                Also all strategic voting does here is ratchet everything to the right and raises the stake for the following election. We decided to let it go for a while and now all we really have is the center-right and far-right. Congrats to every spineless coward who got us here and screamed loud and clear that what they want to see more of is pathetic corporate centrism.

                • dom@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Again, they aren’t spineless cowards when their choices are “evil” and “pretty shitty.” They are voting for what is best for them.

                  You can say that they have other choices, but as individuals, they really do not. Any other vote is essentially a vote for “evil”

                  Look what happened down south. You think those people who voted for Jill Stein are happy that trump got in?

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Liberalism is inherently a right wing political ideology. It uses socially progressive issues for the working class to promote financial and commercial policies that benefit the ruling class.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          The benefit also being increasing their power over the rest of society by means of exercising control over their assets and public institutions staffed by likeminded people. For example by buying news media and shifting focus away from those same issues that provide those benefits.

          E: Saw headlines about a couple of rumors - David Ellison buying CNN and Larry Ellison buying TikTok. The first is the same Ellison who bought CBS via Paramount and is planning to install Bari Weiss as head of news. The second is his dad, Oracle owner and a top 3 richest person in the world.

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      NO!!!

      Kirk wasn’t a ‘conservative pundit,’ he was a bigot, a homophobe, a white supremacist, a sexist piece of shit who cheered on the deaths of others.

      Make it clear: he was a source of hatred and violence.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      My queer, female co-worker was mourning him and binge watching his content recently. I mentioned i was surprised she would listen to him given his views and she basically rebuttaled “uhm actually he does respect women, see he interviewed some porn stars and only fans girls.”

  • Bonus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Why the F does anyone in Canada think they need to capitulate to the absolute worst of America? This is beyond pathetic.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There was two mentions of Charlie Kirk, in a speech that I’d say was focused on condemning political violence, in a mostly non-partisan way. I’d like to think that in Canada we’re above using weapons to prove a point. If we need to beat back the intolerant we’ll do it in an enormous show of non-violent force like Torontonians just did at Christie Pits.

    https://toronto.citynews.ca/2025/09/15/police-outline-charges-after-numerous-arrests-at-opposing-immigration-rallies-at-christie-pits/

    Anyway the speech is what I’d expect from a Conservative, but it’s nuanced enough that I get behind the primary message being conveyed.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That all said, those celebrating Kirk’s death are as much simply expressing themselves as Charlie Kirk was, when he was denigrating immigrants and those that didn’t fit the ideal Aryan description

      And we should also publicly denounce people threatening journalists and professionals like Rachel Gilmore, who had been simply lamenting the appetite for escalation that would come from those seeking retribution, but this was wildly interpreted as a celebration and now is facing a constant barrage of death threats. Which only proved her point btw.