• MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not enough onion flavor here. I just downloaded a full copy of Wikipedia last week in case the trumpanzees go after it.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Been lowkey prepping for a while.

      I’ve been keeping a copy of the Zim for ages just waiting for doom :)

      good time for local copies of books/movies/tv

      good time to have a decent stock of long-term food staples.

      keeping a copy of some LLMs around isn’t bad either; they’re not great, but they are bang for the buck (compression wise) FULL of data from all over the net, you just need to be careful and not just trust it openly.

      I can’t say i’m happy that it seems like it might be useful in my lifespan.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well, fuck me, that’s just. I’m at a loss.
      How can he ever have been seen as a candidate to lead a fucking McDonald’s, let alone a country. Fuck sake.

    • cheers_queers@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have been doing this just so when my kid comes home from high school in ten years to tell me what they learned in “history” class, i can set the record straight

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        My linkwarden has been VERY busy.

        I’ve been careful to categorize only reportable fact, seeing it condensed all on a page from just a couple of months is fucking horrifying.

  • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Uhhhhh, I have specifically downloaded an offline version of Wikipedia. I’m pretty sure this is just regular reporting from The Onion.

    • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s been backed up a zillion times already. Scanning a rare old book and uploading it to Internet Archive and/or Libgen/Z-lib, seeding Anna’s Archive torrents, stuff of that sort is more valuable than an another copy of Wikipedia on your hard drive where nobody will ever touch it.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        Por que no los dos?

        Also, donate to the internet archive. If they go down the internet is megafucked.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        is more valuable than an another copy of Wikipedia on your hard drive where nobody will ever touch it.

        You’re assuming they don’t manage to make ISP’s shut down suspected torrent users and nuke IA from orbit.

        If it’s on your HD, they have to come and take it from you directly for you to lose it.

        Still contribute to IA and AA, absolutely, but don’t except them always to be there.

        Unless things change direction, all that shit is going to have to way further underground and we might end up sneakernetting shit if they decide high-speed internet is to be completely censored.

        • Smith6612@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I know the IA has mentioned in the past they have projects in place to try to back up their archive. I hope their backup plans are true, and if they are attacked by the US, they can relocate to a new safe haven and come back online quickly. The IA has been such a wonderful resource for research and accountability.

          I suppose the major bit of hope I have about the IA is with their partnership with the Library of Congress.

          As for ISPs shutting down Torrent users, I suspect they would do that strictly based on bandwidth usage alone. I know my local Cable company will send nastygrams if they see you using a disproportionate amount of bandwidth compared to other customers. I’ve seen them also shut down Business Internet accounts for doing the exact same thing!

      • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Also something that you should consider regarding Libgen:

        if you go to university you can get access to a lot of studies and papers through your university. This also means, that you can download them and then upload them to libgen, to make them more accessible.

        • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yep, that’s a good practice as well. But make sure to clean up the watermarks that contain identifying info! (I recommend PDF-XChange for that, it’s really powerful.) Sci-hub PDFs are full of them and I wonder if the uploaders ever got exposed that way and had trouble, aside from Aaron Swartz.

    • laranis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Done. I’ve also been hitting up estate sales looking for any kind of book with knowledge in it, especially tables, numbers, conversions, or formulas. I don’t trust our AI riddled internet to tell me how many pints are in a gallon at this point.

      Yes, yes, metric system blah blah. I didn’t choose the system, I just make brownies with it.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        4 quarter gallons to the gallon, 2 pints to the quart, 2 cups to the pt, 8 US fluid Ounces to the cup, 2 table spoons to the floz, 3 teaspoon to the tbsp, 5 ml to the tsp.

        Oh, and a HAndLe is a HALf gallon, and a FIFTH is one FIFTH of a gallon. You can remember that because it starts with ha for half, and fifth for fifth.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yo, I literally did this because I think they’re going to shut down the internet soon.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I don’t think that the fed will shut down the Internet. Not just because it’s effectively impossible to do for a timeframe that’s anything less than a month, but because it would literally destroy the entire country and the regime’s ability to do anything.

      There’s a reason China still has the Internet, and why VPNs are still kind of tolerated. The U.S. nor any industry in it cannot survive without it. We are dozens of much less serious (but still serious) steps away from an internet shutdown, and I genuinely think that we won’t reach internet shutdown at all.

      Without the Internet it’s not just credit cards that stop working, it’s literally the capability for any store to order stuff to sell. Or the capability for every federally regulated employer (nearly all of them) to pay employees. Third world countries can get away with it because their economy isn’t anywhere near as modernized as that of western countries.

      Additionally, the way that the U.S. government is organized makes attacks on the Internet very difficult without Congress.

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I hope you’re right.

        I’m still going to have my local archives of Wikipedia and the like.

        And I’m also going to have my meshtastic and software defined radio

        Edit: what stops the USA from cutting all fiber and just using Nazi starlink?

        • Smith6612@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The US hosts a lot of critical infrastructure for the rest of the Internet, still. There have been a lot of projects to decouple from the US for this exact reason. If you also look at Cable maps, the connectivity between Europe and Asia relies on those high capacity links going through the US. There have been more connections constructed between Europe and Asia to eliminate the US as the only path over the years, but some of those cable routes also tend to venture through contested / not-so-friendly territories. Thus, transit over those paths is also more expensive!

          We also have to consider that Starlink can only do so much. I believe they have trialed or have even activated Inter-satellite connectivity. But that is still a US-based company, and other countries like China are working to launch their own constellations out of fear that US and Europe-based Satellite companies can just come in someday and turn off service.

          Also, cutting that Fiber will break the Public Telephone Network, which is essential for any business. I don’t know how many Telcos maintain Satellite uplinks between continents these days for the PSTN, but the end result won’t be pretty for anyone. Total economic collapse, especially for the US!

          • CubitOom@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I appreciate the words, however I’m an US citizen in the US, most of us (including myself) would be fucked without internet for even a month. Not to mention it being harder to organize resistance, which is why radio is important.

            I’ve also worked in large data centers many years ago. There’s really not too many internet providers in America, and it wouldn’t be hard for a couple of agents to be sent to each backbone data center and just pull the 10 gig fibers out of the ports and then close the building.

            If the US regime wanted to keep internet for themselves (military and partners) they can do that easily with Nazilink (starlink). Or just use radio.

            I don’t think the economy is high on the regimes list of things to worry about as evident by (gestures around) the current state of the us economy. If anything, they might crash the economy so they don’t have to pay off any debt and then switch off of USD and make all the USA use maga crypto.

            • Smith6612@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I do agree with you. I know a fair number of HAMs who continue to network with other radio operators. They are always on standby in the event of a major communications breakdown for public service reasons, and have warehouses of parts and tools in their sheds/homes to repair their radio hardware, as well as hand-powered generation equipment. Mad respect to those people. I’ve sat down with them for a few hours and have enjoyed listening to their projects.

              I also used to work for a Data Center. I hear you there with limited Transit providers. There used to be many more in the past, although consolidation has occurred, and continues to occur. I know SprintLink is under T-Mobile, Level3 is now under CenturyLink/Lumen/whatever you want to call them. Smaller, regional providers I used to use like FiberTech Networks are now under Crown Castle, and Crown Castle is now in the process of merging with Zayo. Providers like XO Communications and UUNet are all under Verizon now. Charter/Spectrum is in the middle of merging with Cox. Frontier is merging with Verizon. Windstream is Windstream… The list goes on, and on, and on. Even though the Data Center I worked at bought as much bandwidth as we could from every major transit provider that is in our local POP, the POP/IX sites, as you mention, are the biggest risk, and that is where targeting will occur.

              The Military already has their own private communication network. They don’t have to do anything. But if they want to seize Starlink, then yeah, that’s the absolute worst case and countries are already exploring ways to avoid that doomsday situation for them. SpaceX already needs to deal with the government for their launches and Orbit coordination.

              As for Cryptocurrency, that brings us back to the general issue at hand with Crypto (and subsequent memecoins). If MAGACrypto were to become the de-facto currency for US, will anyone else accept it for trade? USD is only as powerful as it is because it is the global trade standard. Cutting off the US from trade by severing communications networks will completely devalue the USD. Crypto isn’t going to function without a communications network. If you have to convert from MAGACrypto to USD just to do trade, then MAGACrypto is worthless. I hope no administration in the US, is dumb enough to actually do that. Even if the current Admin and a few past admins have put in the work to make something like that possible. The US, after all, created the technology to do that to begin with.

        • laranis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          They likely can’t do it overnight, but they can do it the same way they’ve been stripping everything else: Joke about it, hint at it, do it a little bit, do it some more in secret, blame liberals for it, do it in Texas or Florida, and then do it completely. They can get exactly the Internet they want us to have if we let them.

        • icelimit@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Starlink or any orbital solution doesn’t have that kind of bandwidth nor latency.

          Actually maybe yes on latency. Idk

      • vividspecter@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ll add that many of the administration are tech bros (or are the property of tech bros) and they need the internet to work to push their products. Heavy censorship and filtering is possible, however.

    • p3n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      They won’t shut down the internet. First, there is way to much $$$ involved in keeping it running. The Tech Bs will push back hard against that. Also, they will realize it is more useful to sensor it and use it for state approved information distribution.

      Basically, this conversation will happen: https://youtu.be/gyt0bZms5zU?t=2069

    • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      they’re going to shut down the internet soon

      They would never do that. If they did, then how would Trump keep spreading his bullshit?

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ohh Potolemy, yeahhh right there…

      Ohh, it’s probably not that kind of content. my bad…

  • karashta@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Did this with Wikipedia in 2024 before they took over.

    Anyone interested, look up kiwix. Offline browser and there should be whole bunch of wikis up on the site if you poke around a bit

  • Deacon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes I do have the entirety of Wikipedia on my personal cloud. That is a prudent step. You should too.